Consultants & Designers Inc. v. Fraschilla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Consultants & Designers Inc. v. Fraschilla

29 A.D.2d 858, 290 N.Y.S.2d 527, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4366

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 26, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 29 A.D.2d 858 (Consultants & Designers Inc. v. Fraschilla) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Consultants & Designers Inc. v. Fraschilla, 29 A.D.2d 858, 290 N.Y.S.2d 527, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4366 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered October 30, 1967, granting the motion by defendant Letscher to dismiss the second cause of action in the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, with leave, however, to plaintiff to apply at Special Term to serve an amended complaint, such application to be made within 20 days after service of a copy of the order hereon with notice to entry. (CPLR 3211, subd. [e]; Beisman Bros. v. Local 29, 27 A D 2d 287; Cushman & Wakefield v. John Davis, Inc., 23 A D 2d 827; 25 A D 2d 133; Andlou Props, v. Grayck, 24 A D 2d 716; Daukas v. Shearson, Hammill é Co., 23 A D 2d 833.) Concur — Stevens, J. P., Eager, Steuer, Tilzer and Rabin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered October 30, 1967, granting the motion by defendant Letscher to dismiss the second cause of action in the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, with leave, however, to plaintiff to apply at Special Term to serve an amended complaint, such application to be made within 20 days after service of a copy of the order hereon with notice to entry. (CPLR 3211, subd. [e]; Beisman Bros. v. Local 29, 27 A D 2d 287; Cushman & Wakefield v. John Davis, Inc., 23 A D 2d 827; 25 A D 2d 133; Andlou Props, v. Grayck, 24 A D 2d 716; Daukas v. Shearson, Hammill é Co., 23 A D 2d 833.) Concur — Stevens, J. P., Eager, Steuer, Tilzer and Rabin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A.D.2d 858, 290 N.Y.S.2d 527, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/consultants-designers-inc-v-fraschilla-nyappdiv-1968.