Consuelo Kelly-Leppert v. United States

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedDecember 10, 2019
Docket18-3525
StatusUnpublished

This text of Consuelo Kelly-Leppert v. United States (Consuelo Kelly-Leppert v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Consuelo Kelly-Leppert v. United States, (8th Cir. 2019).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 18-3525 ___________________________

Consuelo E. Kelly-Leppert,

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant,

v.

United States of America,

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee. ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City ____________

Submitted: December 3, 2019 Filed: December 10, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________

Before COLLOTON, BENTON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Consuelo Kelly-Leppert appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment, based on its finding that her Federal Tort Claims Act action was time-

1 The Honorable Beth Phillips, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. barred. Upon de novo review, see Marsh v. Phelps Cty., 902 F.3d 745, 751 (8th Cir. 2018), we affirm. We agree that Kelly-Leppert’s cause of action accrued prior to 2014, as she had her husband’s death certificate and medical records by 2012, and that her administrative claim filed in 2016 was untimely, even if she filed this civil action within 6 months of the denial of that claim. See United States v. Kubrick, 444 U.S. 111, 123 (1979); Sconiers v. United States, 896 F.3d 595, 598-99 (3d Cir. 2018). We also agree that Kelly-Leppert adduced no evidence showing fraudulent concealment or incapacity to justify equitable tolling. See Jessie v. Potter, 516 F.3d 709, 715 (8th Cir. 2008); Wehrman v. United States, 830 F.2d 1480, 1483 (8th Cir. 1987).

The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. Kelly-Leppert’s pending motions are denied. ______________________________

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Kubrick
444 U.S. 111 (Supreme Court, 1979)
Floyd L. Wehrman v. United States
830 F.2d 1480 (Eighth Circuit, 1987)
Jessie v. Potter
516 F.3d 709 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)
Staci Sconiers v. United States
896 F.3d 595 (Third Circuit, 2018)
Ronda Marsh v. Phelps County
902 F.3d 745 (Eighth Circuit, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Consuelo Kelly-Leppert v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/consuelo-kelly-leppert-v-united-states-ca8-2019.