Construction Pace Setters, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

225 A.D.2d 1090, 639 N.Y.2d 191, 639 N.Y.S.2d 191, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2976
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 8, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 225 A.D.2d 1090 (Construction Pace Setters, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Construction Pace Setters, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 225 A.D.2d 1090, 639 N.Y.2d 191, 639 N.Y.S.2d 191, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2976 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

Memorandum: Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint on Statute of Limitations grounds (see, CPLR 3211 [a] [5]). Even assuming, arguendo, that the limitations period of State Finance Law § 137 applies, plaintiff, a subcontractor, failed timely to commence this action against defendant, which issued a labor and materials bond under that section. An action on a bond issued under that section must be commenced within "one year from the date on which final payment under the claimant’s subcontract became due” (State Finance Law § 137 [4] [b]). The pay when paid provision of the subcontract does not extend the limitations period indefinitely, but merely establishes a time for payment (see, Schuler-Haas Elec. Corp. v Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 49 AD2d 60, 64-66, affd 40 NY2d 883). Plaintiff did not commence this action until one year and seven months after work on the contract had ceased, and thus, plaintiff failed to commence the action within one year of "a [1091]*1091reasonable time after completion of the work to permit the general contractor an opportunity to obtain funds from the owner” (William H. Lane, Inc. v American Druggists’ Ins. Co., 111 AD2d 970, 971; cf., Cortland Paving Co. v Capitol Dist. Contrs., 111 AD2d 955, 956). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Howe, J. — Dismiss Action.) Present — Den-man, P. J., Green, Fallon, Callahan and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Masters Edge, Inc. v. Kemper Insurance Companies/Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.
11 A.D.3d 1034 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Windsor Metal Fabrications, Ltd. v. General Accident Insurance Co. of America
250 A.D.2d 148 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
225 A.D.2d 1090, 639 N.Y.2d 191, 639 N.Y.S.2d 191, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/construction-pace-setters-inc-v-united-states-fidelity-guaranty-co-nyappdiv-1996.