Construction, Incorporated, an Ohio Corporation v. Rockwood Borough Municipal Authority, Rockwood, Somerset County, Pennsylvania

326 F.2d 751, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6645
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided January 22, 1964·No. 14518_1·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In granting summary judgment for the defendant in this suit by a contractor against Rockwood Borough Municipal Authority for repudiation of a public contract, the district court reasoned that no binding contract had ever come into existence.

These facts appear without dispute. The contractor was low bidder. He knew that the Authority’s obtaining of necessary financing was a condition precedent to the making of a binding contract. The Authority prepared and sent to the contractor formal contracting documents for execution and return to the Authority. The contractor signed the formal contract and returned it. However, not obtaining some of the needed financing, the Authority refused to execute the contract. In these circumstances, we think the trial court properly ruled that there was no binding contract. Cf. Wayne Crouse, Inc. v. Braddock Borough School District, 1941, 341 Pa. 497, 19 A.2d 843.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Construction, Incorporated, an Ohio Corporation v. Rockwood Borough Municipal Authority, Rockwood, Somerset County, Pennsylvania, 326 F.2d 751, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6645 (3d Cir. 1964).

326 F.2d 751 (Construction, Incorporated, an Ohio Corporation v. Rockwood Borough Municipal Authority, Rockwood, Somerset County, Pennsylvania) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

ISTARI CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. City of Muscatine
330 N.W.2d 798 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1983)
Hanover Area Sch. Dist. v. Sarkisian Bros., Inc.
514 F. Supp. 697 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1981)