Construction, Building Materials And Miscellaneous Drivers, Local No. 83 v. National Labor Relations Board

590 F.2d 316, 100 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2689, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 17250
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 29, 1979
Docket78-1081
StatusPublished

This text of 590 F.2d 316 (Construction, Building Materials And Miscellaneous Drivers, Local No. 83 v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Construction, Building Materials And Miscellaneous Drivers, Local No. 83 v. National Labor Relations Board, 590 F.2d 316, 100 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2689, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 17250 (9th Cir. 1979).

Opinion

590 F.2d 316

100 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2689, 85 Lab.Cas. P 11,158

CONSTRUCTION, BUILDING MATERIALS AND MISCELLANEOUS DRIVERS,
LOCAL NO. 83, affiliated with the International
Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs,
Warehousemen and Helpers of
America, Petitioner,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.

No. 78-1081.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Jan. 29, 1979.

Michael J. Keenan, Phoenix, Ariz., for petitioner.

Jesse I. Etelson, Atty., Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Petition to Review a Decision of the National Labor Relations Board and Cross-Application of the National Labor Relations Board for Enforcement of its Order.

Before ELY, TRASK and HUG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Decision and Order of the Board is reported at 233 NLRB No. 82.

The underlying facts giving rise to the controversy are carefully explored in the decision of Administrative Law Judge Jenson. In our opinion, there was more than ample evidence to support the conclusion that the Union illegally discriminated against its involved member, violating § 8(a)(3) of the Act, and thus engaged in grossly unfair labor practices, as to the involved employee, within the meaning of § 8(b)(1)(A) and (2) and § 2(6) and (7) of the Act. Accordingly, we reject the contentions made by the Union in its Petition to Review and grant the Board's Cross-Application for the enforcement of its Order. The Board's Order will, by this Court, be

ENFORCED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
590 F.2d 316, 100 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2689, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 17250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/construction-building-materials-and-miscellaneous-drivers-local-no-83-v-ca9-1979.