Constantino Ocampa Aguirre v. Edwin Meese, Attorney General, and John Doe, Special Agent, in Their Individual and Official Capacities

930 F.2d 1292, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 8210, 1991 WL 68947
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedMay 3, 1991
Docket90-1625
StatusPublished
Cited by28 cases

This text of 930 F.2d 1292 (Constantino Ocampa Aguirre v. Edwin Meese, Attorney General, and John Doe, Special Agent, in Their Individual and Official Capacities) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Constantino Ocampa Aguirre v. Edwin Meese, Attorney General, and John Doe, Special Agent, in Their Individual and Official Capacities, 930 F.2d 1292, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 8210, 1991 WL 68947 (7th Cir. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On July 20, 1990, by unpublished order, we affirmed the district court’s denial of Mr. Aguirre’s petition for mandamus, by which he sought to compel the Attorney General of the United States to conduct an expeditious deportation hearing in accordance with 8 U.S.C. § 1252(i), a statute that was enacted in 1986 and that provides that “in the case of an alien who is convicted of an offense which makes the alien subject to deportation, the Attorney General shall begin any deportation proceeding as expeditiously as possible after the date of the conviction.” The Attorney General has requested that we publish our order in order to establish circuit-wide precedent that section 1252(1) does not create a private right of action. (Our unpublished orders are not citable as precedents. 7th Cir.R. 53(b)(2)(iv).) There is no need to publish the entire order. All we need do is make clear our agreement with Gonzalez v. INS, 867 F.2d 1108 (8th Cir.1989), which holds on grounds we find persuasive that section 1252(i) indeed creates no private right of action.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Butt v. United States
D. Maryland, 2022
Hodel v. Aguirre
260 F. Supp. 2d 695 (N.D. Illinois, 2003)
Koss v. Holm
204 F. Supp. 2d 1099 (W.D. Tennessee, 2002)
United States v. Velasquez
930 F. Supp. 1267 (N.D. Illinois, 1996)
United States v. Lopez
938 F. Supp. 481 (N.D. Illinois, 1996)
District of Columbia v. Sierra Club
670 A.2d 354 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1996)
Gonzalez v. United States
883 F. Supp. 1 (D. Puerto Rico, 1995)
Giraldo v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
869 F. Supp. 396 (E.D. Virginia, 1994)
Montoya v. United States
First Circuit, 1994
Cruz v. Molerio
840 F. Supp. 303 (S.D. New York, 1994)
Iheme v. Reno
819 F. Supp. 1192 (E.D. New York, 1993)
Alvaro-Gallo v. United States
814 F. Supp. 1019 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1993)
Giddings v. Chandler
Fifth Circuit, 1992

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
930 F.2d 1292, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 8210, 1991 WL 68947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/constantino-ocampa-aguirre-v-edwin-meese-attorney-general-and-john-doe-ca7-1991.