Constantine v. Grenier

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Constantine v. Grenier

127 A. 656, 81 N.H. 550, 1924 N.H. LEXIS 66

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedNovember 5, 1924

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 127 A. 656 (Constantine v. Grenier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Constantine v. Grenier, 127 A. 656, 81 N.H. 550, 1924 N.H. LEXIS 66 (N.H. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

“The extent to which an examination of this character should be carried is settled at the trial. Gutterson v. Morse, 58 N. H. 165.” Benoit v. Perkins, 79 N. H. 11, 18. The authority relied upon by the defendant (Genest v. Company, 75 N. H. 365) is not in point. It relates to the introduction of independent impeaching evidence, and has no application to cross-examination of the witness whose integrity is called in question.

Exception overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

“The extent to which an examination of this character should be carried is settled at the trial. Gutterson v. Morse, 58 N. H. 165.” Benoit v. Perkins, 79 N. H. 11, 18. The authority relied upon by the defendant (Genest v. Company, 75 N. H. 365) is not in point. It relates to the introduction of independent impeaching evidence, and has no application to cross-examination of the witness whose integrity is called in question.

Exception overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 A. 656, 81 N.H. 550, 1924 N.H. LEXIS 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/constantine-v-grenier-nh-1924.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack