Constantin Refining Co. v. Ricaud

85 So. 620, 147 La. 634, 1920 La. LEXIS 1576
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJune 10, 1920
DocketNo. 23598
StatusPublished

This text of 85 So. 620 (Constantin Refining Co. v. Ricaud) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Constantin Refining Co. v. Ricaud, 85 So. 620, 147 La. 634, 1920 La. LEXIS 1576 (La. 1920).

Opinion

PROVOSTY, J.

All the legal questions involved in this case were considered in the case of same plaintiff against R. B. Day, Tax Collector, 85 South, 613,1 No. 23599, this day decided; the- matter involved being the taxes levied by the city of Baton Rouge under the assessment there in question. For the reasons there assigned.

The judgment appealed from is set aside; the injunction herein is reinstated and made perpetual, at the cost of (defendant in both courts.

MONROE, C. J., concurs in decree and hands down opinion. See 85 South. 617.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Constantin Refining Co. v. Day
85 So. 613 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 So. 620, 147 La. 634, 1920 La. LEXIS 1576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/constantin-refining-co-v-ricaud-la-1920.