Constantin Refining Co. v. Ricaud

85 So. 620, 147 La. 634, 1920 La. LEXIS 1576
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 10, 1920·No. No. 23598·Published

Opinion

PROVOSTY, J.

All the legal questions involved in this case were considered in the case of same plaintiff against R. B. Day, Tax Collector, 85 South, 613,1 No. 23599, this day decided; the- matter involved being the taxes levied by the city of Baton Rouge under the assessment there in question. For the reasons there assigned.

The judgment appealed from is set aside; the injunction herein is reinstated and made perpetual, at the cost of (defendant in both courts.

MONROE, C. J., concurs in decree and hands down opinion. See 85 South. 617.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Constantin Refining Co. v. Ricaud, 85 So. 620, 147 La. 634, 1920 La. LEXIS 1576 (La. 1920).

85 So. 620 (Constantin Refining Co. v. Ricaud) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Constantin Refining Co. v. Day
85 So. 613 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1920)