Constant v. University of Rochester

Superior Court of New York

Constant v. University of Rochester

17 N.Y.S. 363, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 650

CourtThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

DecidedDecember 17, 1891

StatusPublished

This text of 17 N.Y.S. 363 (Constant v. University of Rochester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Constant v. University of Rochester, 17 N.Y.S. 363, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 650 (superctny 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Curiah.

We have examined the record in the light of the opinion of the court of appeals, (111 N. Y. 604, 19 N. E. Rep. 631,) and find that the defects in the proof in the former trial have been supplied, and the present, record requires an affirmance. Eor these reasons, and those expressed by the trial judge in his opinion, printed on pages 70, 71, of the case, the judgment appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiah.

We have examined the record in the light of the opinion of the court of appeals, (111 N. Y. 604, 19 N. E. Rep. 631,) and find that the defects in the proof in the former trial have been supplied, and the present, record requires an affirmance. Eor these reasons, and those expressed by the trial judge in his opinion, printed on pages 70, 71, of the case, the judgment appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 N.Y.S. 363, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/constant-v-university-of-rochester-superctny-1891.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack