Constant v. University of Rochester

The Superior Court of New York City

Constant v. University of Rochester

41 N.Y. St. Rep. 955

CourtThe Superior Court of New York City

DecidedDecember 17, 1891

StatusPublished

This text of 41 N.Y. St. Rep. 955 (Constant v. University of Rochester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Constant v. University of Rochester, 41 N.Y. St. Rep. 955 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have examined the record in the light of the opinion of the court of appeals (111 N. Y., 604; 20 St. Rep., 211), and find that the defects in the proof on the former trial have been supphed and that the present record requires an affirmance. For these reasons and those expressed by the trial judge in his opinion, printed on pages 70 and 71 of the case, the judgment appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We have examined the record in the light of the opinion of the court of appeals (111 N. Y., 604; 20 St. Rep., 211), and find that the defects in the proof on the former trial have been supphed and that the present record requires an affirmance. For these reasons and those expressed by the trial judge in his opinion, printed on pages 70 and 71 of the case, the judgment appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 N.Y. St. Rep. 955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/constant-v-university-of-rochester-nysuperctnyc-1891.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack