Constant v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Constant v. State

258 So. 2d 373, 260 La. 1113, 1972 La. LEXIS 4818

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 3, 1972

DocketNo. 52078

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 258 So. 2d 373 (Constant v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Constant v. State, 258 So. 2d 373, 260 La. 1113, 1972 La. LEXIS 4818 (La. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: Ann Walls Constant, Individually and as Tutrix for her Minor Children, Stacy D’Laine Constant, Douglas John Constant, Jr., and Elizabeth Annette Constant, applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 255 So.2d 453.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.

Briefing is requested, as well as on the issues decided below, on what remedy is available to the plaintiff as the widow of a National Guardsman, and also as to whether, if workmen’s compensation is the remedy (See La.R.S. 29:39 prior to its repeal after this accident), amendment of the pleadings may be permitted. See La.C.C.P. Arts. 1153, 2164.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Ann Walls Constant, Individually and as Tutrix for her Minor Children, Stacy D’Laine Constant, Douglas John Constant, Jr., and Elizabeth Annette Constant, applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 255 So.2d 453.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.

Briefing is requested, as well as on the issues decided below, on what remedy is available to the plaintiff as the widow of a National Guardsman, and also as to whether, if workmen’s compensation is the remedy (See La.R.S. 29:39 prior to its repeal after this accident), amendment of the pleadings may be permitted. See La.C.C.P. Arts. 1153, 2164.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 So. 2d 373, 260 La. 1113, 1972 La. LEXIS 4818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/constant-v-state-la-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack