Constant v. Schloss

City of New York Municipal Court

Constant v. Schloss

55 N.Y.S. 1138

DecidedJanuary 18, 1899

StatusPublished

This text of 55 N.Y.S. 1138 (Constant v. Schloss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Constant v. Schloss, 55 N.Y.S. 1138 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

O’DWYER, J.

We are of the opinion that at special term the plaintiff made a case entitling him to a portion of the particulars demanded, and that the order appealed from should be reversed, with costs, and the motion granted, without costs, as prayed for-in the notice of motion, with the exception that the defendant need not furnish any particulars as to the respect in which the shellac was of an inferior quality, and not strictly pure and. first class. OLCOTT, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O’DWYER, J.

We are of the opinion that at special term the plaintiff made a case entitling him to a portion of the particulars demanded, and that the order appealed from should be reversed, with costs, and the motion granted, without costs, as prayed for-in the notice of motion, with the exception that the defendant need not furnish any particulars as to the respect in which the shellac was of an inferior quality, and not strictly pure and. first class. OLCOTT, J., concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 N.Y.S. 1138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/constant-v-schloss-nynyccityct-1899.