Constant v. Schloss

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Constant v. Schloss

26 Misc. 847

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1899

StatusPublished

This text of 26 Misc. 847 (Constant v. Schloss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Constant v. Schloss, 26 Misc. 847 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

O’Dwyeb, J.

We are of the opinion that at Special Term plaintiff made a case entitling him to a portion of the particulars demanded, and that the order appealed from should be reversed, with costs, and the motion granted, without costs, as prayed for in the notice of motion, with the exception that the defendants need not furnish any particulars as to the respect in which the shellac was of an inferior quality, and not strictly pure and first-class.

Olcott, J., concurs.

Order reversed, with costs, and motion granted, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O’Dwyeb, J.

We are of the opinion that at Special Term plaintiff made a case entitling him to a portion of the particulars demanded, and that the order appealed from should be reversed, with costs, and the motion granted, without costs, as prayed for in the notice of motion, with the exception that the defendants need not furnish any particulars as to the respect in which the shellac was of an inferior quality, and not strictly pure and first-class.

Olcott, J., concurs.

Order reversed, with costs, and motion granted, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 Misc. 847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/constant-v-schloss-nyappterm-1899.