Constance v. Benfer Enterprises, LLC

Missouri Court of Appeals

Constance v. Benfer Enterprises, LLC

529 S.W.3d 334

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 19, 2017

DocketWD 80241

StatusPublished

This text of 529 S.W.3d 334 (Constance v. Benfer Enterprises, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Constance v. Benfer Enterprises, LLC, 529 S.W.3d 334 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam:

Benfer Enterprises, LLC appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson' County,‘Missouri, entered following a bench trial, in favor of Bradley Constance, Personal Representative of the Estate of Vickie Richardson. The trial court concluded that Benfer Enterprises wrongfully towed and wrongfully withheld a motorcycle legally owned by Ms. Richardson at the time of her death. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the partiés. The trial'court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam:

Benfer Enterprises, LLC appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson' County,‘Missouri, entered following a bench trial, in favor of Bradley Constance, Personal Representative of the Estate of Vickie Richardson. The trial court concluded that Benfer Enterprises wrongfully towed and wrongfully withheld a motorcycle legally owned by Ms. Richardson at the time of her death. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the partiés. The trial'court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

529 S.W.3d 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/constance-v-benfer-enterprises-llc-moctapp-2017.