Constable v. Dayton
This text of 63 A.D.2d 976 (Constable v. Dayton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a negligence action, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, entered August 26,1977, which denied their motion for summary judgment. Order reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and motion granted. On the present record, there is no evidence to indicate that defendants’ dog was the cause of injuries to the infant plaintiff. Accordingly, no triable issue of fact is presented. Gulotta, J. P., Shapiro, Cohalan and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 A.D.2d 976, 406 N.Y.S.2d 111, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/constable-v-dayton-nyappdiv-1978.