Consoweld Distributors v. Slaughter
This text of 502 So. 2d 503 (Consoweld Distributors v. Slaughter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
While there was error in the order of the deputy commissioner regarding medical testimony establishing permanent impairment, “based on AMA [American Medical Association] guidelines,” we deem the error to be harmless. There was competent medical testimony establishing that the claimant suffered a permanent impairment and that the guidelines did not apply to the condition suffered by the claimant. We note that when permanent impairment cannot reasonably be determined under the guidelines, it “may be established under other generally accepted medical criteria for determining impairment.” Trindade v. Abbey Road Beef ‘N Booze, 443 So.2d 1007, 1012 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
502 So. 2d 503, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 534, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/consoweld-distributors-v-slaughter-fladistctapp-1987.