Consoweld Distributors v. Slaughter

502 So. 2d 503, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 534, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6776
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 13, 1987·No. No. BM-253·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

While there was error in the order of the deputy commissioner regarding medical testimony establishing permanent impairment, “based on AMA [American Medical Association] guidelines,” we deem the error to be harmless. There was competent medical testimony establishing that the claimant suffered a permanent impairment and that the guidelines did not apply to the condition suffered by the claimant. We note that when permanent impairment cannot reasonably be determined under the guidelines, it “may be established under other generally accepted medical criteria for determining impairment.” Trindade v. Abbey Road Beef ‘N Booze, 443 So.2d 1007, 1012 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, SHIVERS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Consoweld Distributors v. Slaughter, 502 So. 2d 503, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 534, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6776 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

502 So. 2d 503 (Consoweld Distributors v. Slaughter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fuster v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.
545 So. 2d 268 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)