Consolo v. United States

Sixth Circuit

Consolo v. United States

201 F.2d 56, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2382

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedDecember 18, 1952

Docket11621_1

StatusPublished

This text of 201 F.2d 56 (Consolo v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Consolo v. United States, 201 F.2d 56, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2382 (6th Cir. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal, from a judgement of conviction entered upon the verdict of a jury *57 and from a sentence of five years’ imprisonment imposed by the United States District Judge, has been heard and considered on the record and on the oral arguments and briefs of opposing attorneys;

And it appearing that there is substantial evidence to support the charge that appellant caused to be transported in interstate commerce a stolen motor vehicle, knowing that the same had been stolen, that the case was submitted to the jury on a correct charge and that no error of law was committed in the trial of the case;

The judgment of conviction and sentence is in consequence affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal, from a judgement of conviction entered upon the verdict of a jury *57 and from a sentence of five years’ imprisonment imposed by the United States District Judge, has been heard and considered on the record and on the oral arguments and briefs of opposing attorneys;

And it appearing that there is substantial evidence to support the charge that appellant caused to be transported in interstate commerce a stolen motor vehicle, knowing that the same had been stolen, that the case was submitted to the jury on a correct charge and that no error of law was committed in the trial of the case;

The judgment of conviction and sentence is in consequence affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 F.2d 56, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/consolo-v-united-states-ca6-1952.