Consolidated Water Co. of Utica v. Maltbie
255 A.D. 919, 8 N.Y.S.2d 125, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5848
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 23, 1938·Published
Opinion
It appearing from the papers on file in the court that the questions involved in the action have become academic, plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the appeal is, therefore, granted. The order of dismissal is without prejudice to the right of defendants to apply for the reinstatement of such appeal if changed conditions should render such a course advisable. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Hefiernan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Consolidated Water Co. of Utica v. Maltbie, 255 A.D. 919, 8 N.Y.S.2d 125, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5848 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).
255 A.D. 919 (Consolidated Water Co. of Utica v. Maltbie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.