Consolidated Underwriters v. Fitts

106 S.W.2d 793, 1937 Tex. App. LEXIS 607
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 2, 1937
DocketNo. 3075.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 106 S.W.2d 793 (Consolidated Underwriters v. Fitts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Consolidated Underwriters v. Fitts, 106 S.W.2d 793, 1937 Tex. App. LEXIS 607 (Tex. Ct. App. 1937).

Opinion

WALKER, Chief Justice.

This is a compensation case. On September 5, 1934, R. U. Fitts was killed in Jasper county by a falling tree. On the verdict of the jury, finding that he was killed in the course of his employment with Peavy-Moore Lumber Company, judgment was entéred in favor of appellee, Mrs. Allie Fitts, his surviving widow, against appellant, Consolidated Underwriters, the compensation insurance carrier of Peavy-Moore Lumber Company, for the lump sum of $3,942.46.

Prior to the morning of Fitts’ death he was an independent logging contractor in the employment of Peavy-Moore Lumber Company, and in that employment was not within the protection of appellant’s policy of insurance. It is the theory of appellee, pleaded in her cross-action to appellant’s appeal from an adverse award of the Industrial Accident Board, that, on the morning Fitts was killed, he was employed by Peavy-Moore Lumber Company as a log scaler and was killed in the course of that employment. That theory was submitted to the jury and found in appellee’s favor.

It was the theory of appellant, brought forward as the basis of this appeal, that Fitts was killed in the regular course of his work as an independent contractor, and that the verdict of the jury, finding that he was killed while in the course of his employment as a log scaler, is wholly without support in the evidence. The following summary of the evidence reflects all the facts on the controverted issue.

Fitts, with his trucks and teams, was hauling saw logs from the woods to Bess-may and Buna, loading stations on the railroad, a distance of six or seven miles, for shipment to Peavy-Moore Lumber Company sawmill at Deweyville, Newton county. He was operating three trucks and several logging teams, and as an independent contractor had in his employment seven men. He and his men did not cut the logs he was hauling; this work was done by sawyers employed by Peavy-Moore Lumber Company, who worked in pairs, and the logs cut by these sawyers were scaled by a log scaler in the employment of Peavy-Moore Lumber Company, one Major Kelly. Mr. Fitts, as an independent log contractor, hauled the logs with his trucks and teams from certain territory, set apart to him by metes and bounds by the Peavy-Moore Lumber Company woods foreman, one Walter Bean, who had general charge of the woods operations. Mr. Fitts was not required to scale his logs in the woods, or on his trucks; that was done for him at the shipping point by a scaler in the employment of Peavy-Moore Lumber Company, but for his own protection he carried with him in the woods where his trucks picked up the logs his scale stick and his scale book; he scaled some of his logs after they were loaded on his trucks and some of the logs as they lay on the ground, *794 and entered the scale in his log book, but he did not scale all the logs hauled by his trucks. On the morning he was killed Fitts was in the woods with his -trucks on the territory assigned to him for logging, and had loaded out one or more of his trucks when Walter Bean, the woods foreman, came to him saying that his regular log scaler could not be in the woods that day and made Mr. Fitts an offer of hire to scale logs that day behind the log sawyers. Mr. Bean’s offer to Mr. Fitts was heard by several witnesses, but no witness heard Mr. Fitts’ answer. A few moments after Mr. Bean left the woods, Mr. Fitts, with his scale stick and scale book in his hands, was walking towards two sawyers who were cutting logs within the territory assigned to Fitts for logging. As the tree they were cutting started to fall they saw Mr. Fitts walking toward them. They called to-him a warning, he stopped when they called to him, and was killed in his tracks by the falling tree. The witnesses described these events as follows, questions and answers reduced to narrative. Appellee’s witnesses:

Frank Smith:

“I had been working for Mr. Fitts for two years, right around two years. I was driving a log truck. At the time of Mr. Fitts’ death he had been employed or engaged in hauling logs for Peavy-Moore around three or four months, or five. I had been in the vicinity of Buna three or four months before Mr. Fitts got killed. Mr. Fitts had three individual trucks on that job. He had seven men working for him, I believe. Up until the day he was killed I don’t know whether or not Mr. Fitts had anything to do with cutting the logs. Peavy-Moore cut the logs he was hauling.
“I know a man by the name of Walter Bean. He was woods foreman, supervisor of the woods, for Peavy-Moore Lumber Company. I know a man named Major Kelly. He was employed by Peavy-Moore Lumber Company at that time. He scaled after the saws down on the Boat Lake haul, east of Buna. At the time Mr. Fitts died we had just gone on that present haul that morning.
“In hauling those logs out of the woods the land was set aside to Mr. Fitts to haul off of in strips like. I went to the woods to work that morning. I reckon it’s six or seven miles from Buna to those woods; I never did measure it. On the Sth of September, 1934, we got out to the job about 7:15 or 7:30. Nobody was out there but .the employees working for him (referring to Fitts).
“When I got there Mr. Fitts was there where the timber set in to be cut at the job we started on that morning. Very little timber had been cut when I got there. Nobody was cutting timber where we were; I heard a saw back north of us. When I got there I saw Mr. Fitts and Mr. Bean. I heard some conversation between Mr. Bean and Mr. Fitts.”
“Q. If you heard any conversation that morning between Mr. Bean and Mr. Fitts, with reference to employment of Mr. Fitts-for any purpose I wish you would tell just what it was. A. Well, I was sitting there fixing to-a pair of gloves and Mr. Bean-told Mr. Fitts, said, I got to take the woods scaler and put on the track today and I want you to scale the logs these-saws cut today until I get somebody to relieve you; I have to take my woods-scaler and put on the track, we got to have them loaded and scaled on the track.
“Q. Go ahead and detail just what was said. A. We went ahead and loaded—
“Q. Let’s get through with the conversation. A. Mr. Bean said I want you to scale the logs for me today; I had to take my scaler; he went ahead and scaled the logs that was laying on the ground.
“Q. Was that all that was said? I want you to detail all the conversation you heard between Mr. Fitts and Mr. Bean about Mr. Fitts. A. Well Mr. Bean asked him would he scale, he told him he wanted him to scale the logs that day, he had to take his saw scaler to the track to scale the logs; he would outline the way the strip run and the saws that he had to cut for him, that he would have to scale for him, that he would scale for him that day.”
“Mr. Fitts and Mr. Bean went around to where there was some logs to be scaled and loaded. That was on Company land, company’s timber I mean. That was on the strip that was set apart for Mr. Fitts’ trucks to haul. That was after I heard Mr. Bean tell Mr. Fitts he wanted him to scale for him that day. After that Mr. Bean left. Then Mr. Fitts was scaling the logs; the logs he went ahead to scale were on the strip of land that had been set apart for Mr. Fitts to log that day. I never saw Mr. Fitts any more alive. The Negroes hollering Mr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Federal Underwriters Exchange v. Turner
140 S.W.2d 885 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 S.W.2d 793, 1937 Tex. App. LEXIS 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/consolidated-underwriters-v-fitts-texapp-1937.