Consolidated Traction Co. v. Taborn
36 A. 1128, 58 N.J.L. 408, 29 Vroom 408, 1895 N.J. LEXIS 3
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Consolidated Traction Co. v. Taborn. Read the opinion of the Court — 58 N.J.L. 1 →
Opinion
The judgment below is affirmed, for the reasons given by the Supreme Court.
For-affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Lippincott, Ludlow, Mague, Yan Syckel, Bogert, Brown, Smith, Talman. 10.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Consolidated Traction Co. v. Taborn, 36 A. 1128, 58 N.J.L. 408, 29 Vroom 408, 1895 N.J. LEXIS 3 (N.J. 1895).
36 A. 1128 (Consolidated Traction Co. v. Taborn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.