Consolidated Traction Co. v. Knoth

36 A. 1086, 59 N.J.L. 582, 30 Vroom 582, 1896 N.J. LEXIS 7
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 15, 1896
StatusPublished

This text of 36 A. 1086 (Consolidated Traction Co. v. Knoth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Consolidated Traction Co. v. Knoth, 36 A. 1086, 59 N.J.L. 582, 30 Vroom 582, 1896 N.J. LEXIS 7 (N.J. 1896).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

It is clear that the case was one for decision by the jury. No question is raised as to the correctness of the exposition of the law by the judge in his submission of the case to that body.

Let the judgment be affirmed.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Mague, Van S yokel, Bark alow, Bogert, Da yon, Hendrickson, Nixon. 11.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 A. 1086, 59 N.J.L. 582, 30 Vroom 582, 1896 N.J. LEXIS 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/consolidated-traction-co-v-knoth-nj-1896.