Consolidated Traction Co. v. Knoth

36 A. 1086, 59 N.J.L. 582, 30 Vroom 582, 1896 N.J. LEXIS 7
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 15, 1896·Published

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

It is clear that the case was one for decision by the jury. No question is raised as to the correctness of the exposition of the law by the judge in his submission of the case to that body.

Let the judgment be affirmed.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Mague, Van S yokel, Bark alow, Bogert, Da yon, Hendrickson, Nixon. 11.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Consolidated Traction Co. v. Knoth, 36 A. 1086, 59 N.J.L. 582, 30 Vroom 582, 1896 N.J. LEXIS 7 (N.J. 1896).

36 A. 1086 (Consolidated Traction Co. v. Knoth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.