Consolidated Terminal Corp. v. Henderson

8 F.R.D. 494, 1942 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1856
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided January 6, 1942·No. No. 13534·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

BAILEY, Associate Justice.

The motion to dismiss what is denominated in the complaint as a cross claim should be sustained. The complaint does not seek to enforce any lien upon the property sold to the defendant Henderson but to maintain this “cross claim,” would 'be to permit the plaintiff to bring in any party who may be indebted to the defendant Henderson. If the plaintiff should be successful in obtaining a judgment against defendant Henderson, it would not thereby have any priority over other creditors except as to any judgment lien to which it might be entitled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Consolidated Terminal Corp. v. Henderson, 8 F.R.D. 494, 1942 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1856 (D.D.C. 1942).

8 F.R.D. 494 (Consolidated Terminal Corp. v. Henderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related