Consolidated Terminal Corp. v. Henderson
This text of 8 F.R.D. 494 (Consolidated Terminal Corp. v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The motion to dismiss what is denominated in the complaint as a cross claim should be sustained. The complaint does not seek to enforce any lien upon the property sold to the defendant Henderson but to maintain this “cross claim,” would 'be to permit the plaintiff to bring in any party who may be indebted to the defendant Henderson. If the plaintiff should be successful in obtaining a judgment against defendant Henderson, it would not thereby have any priority over other creditors except as to any judgment lien to which it might be entitled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 F.R.D. 494, 1942 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/consolidated-terminal-corp-v-henderson-dcd-1942.