Consolidated Stores, Inc. v. Gargis

686 So. 2d 278, 1996 Ala. LEXIS 725
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedNovember 22, 1996
Docket1951847
StatusPublished

This text of 686 So. 2d 278 (Consolidated Stores, Inc. v. Gargis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Consolidated Stores, Inc. v. Gargis, 686 So. 2d 278, 1996 Ala. LEXIS 725 (Ala. 1996).

Opinion

BUTTS, Justice.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied.

Our denial of the petition in this ease should not be taken as an approval of the reasoning in the Court of Civil Appeals’ opinion.

WRIT DENIED.

HOOPER, C.J., and ALMON and COOK, JJ., concur. HOUSTON, J., concurs in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
686 So. 2d 278, 1996 Ala. LEXIS 725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/consolidated-stores-inc-v-gargis-ala-1996.