Consolidated Service Stations, Inc. v. Cities Service Oil Co.
279 A.D. 592, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3119
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 8, 1951·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Plaintiff is entitled to recover rent from defendant, not because there is or will be created a landlord-tenant relationship between them, but because plaintiff is, as matter of law, the assignee of the landlord’s right to recover rent from defendant. (United Merchants’ Realty & Improvement Co. v. Roth, 193 N. Y. 570.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ. [See post, p. 665.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Consolidated Service Stations, Inc. v. Cities Service Oil Co., 279 A.D. 592, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3119 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).
279 A.D. 592 (Consolidated Service Stations, Inc. v. Cities Service Oil Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Varela v. Miller
204 Misc. 88 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1953)
Heydenryk v. Bell
201 Misc. 139 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)
N. R. M. Garage Corp. v. Morris Feig Garage Corp.
279 A.D. 126 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)