Home/California Supreme Court/Consolidated Reservoir Power Company v. Bowen

Consolidated Reservoir Power Company v. Bowen

16 P.2d 271, 216 Cal. 787, 1932 Cal. LEXIS 650
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 23, 1932
DocketDocket No. L.A. 11532.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 16 P.2d 271 (Consolidated Reservoir Power Company v. Bowen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Consolidated Reservoir Power Company v. Bowen, 16 P.2d 271, 216 Cal. 787, 1932 Cal. LEXIS 650 (Cal. 1932).

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon an order sustaining demurrers to the complaint without leave to amend.

[1] The facts here involved, and the complaint and demurrers, are, in all material respects similar to those involved in the case of Consolidated Reservoir Power Co. v. Scarborough, (L.A. No. 11407) ante, p. 698 [16 P.2d 268], this day decided. For the reasons set forth in the opinion in that case, it is hereby ordered that the judgment herein appealed from be and same is affirmed.

Preston, J., dissented. *Page 788

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oeth v. Mason
247 Cal. App. 2d 805 (California Court of Appeal, 1967)
Remus Films, Ltd. v. William Morris Agency, Inc.
244 Cal. App. 2d 763 (California Court of Appeal, 1966)
Hart v. Gudger
314 P.2d 549 (California Court of Appeal, 1957)
Stevens v. Bryson
27 P.2d 932 (California Court of Appeal, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 P.2d 271, 216 Cal. 787, 1932 Cal. LEXIS 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/consolidated-reservoir-power-company-v-bowen-cal-1932.