Consolidated Real Estate Investments, Inc. v. Padilla ex rel. Padilla
This text of 529 So. 2d 1263 (Consolidated Real Estate Investments, Inc. v. Padilla ex rel. Padilla) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Consolidated Real Estate Investments, Inc., owner of a mobile home park, appeals the trial court’s denial of its post-trial motions and a final judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of park tenants, Jimmy and Justo Padilla. We affirm the trial court’s denial of Consolidated’s post-trial motions based on Consolidated’s failure to demonstrate reversible error. See Ruppenthal v. Wood, 425 So.2d 194 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Reeder v. Edward M. Chadbourne, Inc., 338 So.2d 271 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976). We also affirm the final judgment in favor of the Padillas. A jury could have reasonably inferred from the evidence presented at trial that, notwithstanding the fact that Dade County was the actual owner of the grass swale where Jimmy fell and was injured, the accident site was part of an approach to the mobile home park. Accordingly, the trial court properly entered judgment for the Padillas pursuant to the jury verdict. City of Pensacola v. Stamm, 448 So.2d 39 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. denied, 456 So.2d 1181 (Fla.1984).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
529 So. 2d 1263, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1972, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3753, 1988 WL 86505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/consolidated-real-estate-investments-inc-v-padilla-ex-rel-padilla-fladistctapp-1988.