Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Hudacs

688 N.E.2d 255, 90 N.Y.2d 958, 665 N.Y.S.2d 399, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 4818
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 16, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 688 N.E.2d 255 (Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Hudacs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Hudacs, 688 N.E.2d 255, 90 N.Y.2d 958, 665 N.Y.S.2d 399, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 4818 (N.Y. 1997).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice D. Bruce Crew, III, at the Appellate Division (223 AD2d 289).

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schiferle v. Capital Fence Co., Inc.
2017 NY Slip Op 7059 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
688 N.E.2d 255, 90 N.Y.2d 958, 665 N.Y.S.2d 399, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 4818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/consolidated-rail-corp-v-hudacs-ny-1997.