Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Hudacs

688 N.E.2d 255, 90 N.Y.2d 958, 665 N.Y.S.2d 399, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 4818
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 16, 1997·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice D. Bruce Crew, III, at the Appellate Division (223 AD2d 289).

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Hudacs, 688 N.E.2d 255, 90 N.Y.2d 958, 665 N.Y.S.2d 399, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 4818 (N.Y. 1997).

688 N.E.2d 255 (Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Hudacs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schiferle v. Capital Fence Co., Inc.
2017 NY Slip Op 7059 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)