Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds and British Co.

Third Circuit

Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds and British Co.

853 F.2d 917, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 9524, 1988 WL 73680

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJune 13, 1988

Docket87-1675

StatusPublished

This text of 853 F.2d 917 (Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds and British Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds and British Co., 853 F.2d 917, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 9524, 1988 WL 73680 (3d Cir. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

853 F.2d 917

Consolidated Rail Corporation
v.
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds and British Company,
Employers Insurance of Wausau, Northbrook Insurance Company,
California Union Insurance Company, International Surplus
Lines Insurance Company, Lexington Insurance Company,
American Universal Insurance Company, Dover Insurance
Company, Britamco Ltd.

NO. 87-1675

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

JUN 13, 1988

Appeal From: E.D.Pa.,

Green, J.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI