Consolidated Pre-Stressed Concrete, Inc. v. County of Volusia

633 So. 2d 541, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1948, 1994 WL 72262
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 11, 1994
DocketNo. 93-2048
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 633 So. 2d 541 (Consolidated Pre-Stressed Concrete, Inc. v. County of Volusia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Consolidated Pre-Stressed Concrete, Inc. v. County of Volusia, 633 So. 2d 541, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1948, 1994 WL 72262 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

COBB, Judge.

The appellants, Consolidated Pre-Stressed Concrete, Inc. and F. Browne Gregg, appeal from the trial court’s entry of a temporary injunction which enjoined them from operating their concrete batch plant until they fulfilled all the necessary permit requirements set forth by Volusia County. Specifically, the trial court referred to the requirements of the Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 88-3 and Volusia County Zoning Ordinance No. 80-8.

After careful review of the record, we reverse the temporary injunction to the extent that it refers to th'e Volusia County Land Development Code, Ordinance Number 88-3, as amended. As conceded by Volusia County, their motion for temporary injunction only asked the court to enjoin Consolidated from operating in violation of the “Zoning Ordinance.” In addition, both the variance and special exception mentioned in the County’s motion dealt with compliance in regard to a 300 foot setback only. Finally, there were no allegations pertaining to Ordinance No. 88-3 within the County’s counterclaim.

The County suggests that permits under the Land Development Code were mentioned several times during the hearing. The problem with the County’s position is that, at least in this action giving rise to the temporary injunction, compliance with Ordinance No. 88-3 was clearly never an issue.

Accordingly, the non-final order of temporary injunction is reversed as to references to the Volusia County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 88-3, as amended. The order is affirmed in all other respects.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.

HARRIS, C.J., and GOSHORN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williford v. Melbourne Commercial Development, Inc.
682 So. 2d 1234 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
633 So. 2d 541, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1948, 1994 WL 72262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/consolidated-pre-stressed-concrete-inc-v-county-of-volusia-fladistctapp-1994.