Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Consolidated Natures Prime v. Lorenzoni

Consolidated Natures Prime v. Lorenzoni

458 So. 2d 1222, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2421, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16579
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 16, 1984
DocketNo. AZ-41
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 458 So. 2d 1222 (Consolidated Natures Prime v. Lorenzoni) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Consolidated Natures Prime v. Lorenzoni, 458 So. 2d 1222, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2421, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16579 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

WENTWORTH, Judge.

The appealed order, finding claimant to be an employee for purposes of the Workers’ Compensation Act, patently fails to dispose of all matured issues and is therefore dismissed. City of Tampa v. Fein, 438 So.2d 442 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Winkel v. Grand Union Stores, 436 So.2d 351 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Crown Hotel v. Friedman, 420 So.2d 418 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Town of Palm Beach v. Watts, 426 So.2d 1312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Monroe County Sheriff's Department v. Ruth, 424 So.2d 905 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Wash House v. Tucker, 413 So.2d 813 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

SHIVERS and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Sarasota Professional Sports
508 So. 2d 475 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
458 So. 2d 1222, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2421, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/consolidated-natures-prime-v-lorenzoni-fladistctapp-1984.