Consolidated Natures Prime v. Lorenzoni

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Consolidated Natures Prime v. Lorenzoni

458 So. 2d 1222, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2421, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16579

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 16, 1984·No. No. AZ-41·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

WENTWORTH, Judge.

The appealed order, finding claimant to be an employee for purposes of the Workers’ Compensation Act, patently fails to dispose of all matured issues and is therefore dismissed. City of Tampa v. Fein, 438 So.2d 442 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Winkel v. Grand Union Stores, 436 So.2d 351 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Crown Hotel v. Friedman, 420 So.2d 418 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Town of Palm Beach v. Watts, 426 So.2d 1312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Monroe County Sheriff's Department v. Ruth, 424 So.2d 905 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Wash House v. Tucker, 413 So.2d 813 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

SHIVERS and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WENTWORTH, Judge.

The appealed order, finding claimant to be an employee for purposes of the Workers’ Compensation Act, patently fails to dispose of all matured issues and is therefore dismissed. City of Tampa v. Fein, 438 So.2d 442 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Winkel v. Grand Union Stores, 436 So.2d 351 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Crown Hotel v. Friedman, 420 So.2d 418 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Town of Palm Beach v. Watts, 426 So.2d 1312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Monroe County Sheriff's Department v. Ruth, 424 So.2d 905 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Wash House v. Tucker, 413 So.2d 813 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

SHIVERS and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Consolidated Natures Prime v. Lorenzoni, 458 So. 2d 1222, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2421, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16579 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

458 So. 2d 1222 (Consolidated Natures Prime v. Lorenzoni) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related