Consolidated Motor Freight, Inc. v. Bedford

26 P.2d 1066, 93 Colo. 440, 1933 Colo. LEXIS 455
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedOctober 18, 1933
DocketNo. 13,382.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 26 P.2d 1066 (Consolidated Motor Freight, Inc. v. Bedford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Consolidated Motor Freight, Inc. v. Bedford, 26 P.2d 1066, 93 Colo. 440, 1933 Colo. LEXIS 455 (Colo. 1933).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Hilliard

delivered the opinion of the court.

For the reasons announced in our opinion in Walker v. Bedford, 93 Colo. 400, 26 P. (2d) 1051, decided this day, the judgment herein should he reversed. We have found it unnecessary, in the light of our finding in the Walker case that chapter 14, Session Laws of the Extraordinary Session of 1933, is void because repugnant to sections 3 and 7, article X, of the Constitution, to pass upon the question, presented in this case alone, of whether that act does not also contravene paragraph 3, section 8, article I, of the Constitution of the United States.

Let the order be that the judgment of the trial court is reversed, with instructions to overrule the demurrer.

Mr. Chief Justice Adams, Mr. Justice Campbell and Mr. Justice Burke concur.

Mr. Justice Butler, Mr. Justice Bouck and Mr. Justice Holland dissent for the reasons stated in their respective dissenting* opinions in Walker v. Bedford, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walker v. Bedford
26 P.2d 1051 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 P.2d 1066, 93 Colo. 440, 1933 Colo. LEXIS 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/consolidated-motor-freight-inc-v-bedford-colo-1933.