Consolidated International Equipment & Supply Co. v. United States

60 Cust. Ct. 1035, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1879
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Consolidated International Equipment & Supply Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 56 Cust. Ct. 442
United States Customs Court·Decided April 17, 1968·No. No. P68/212; protest 66/72670 (New York)·Published

Opinion

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of paper cutters and parts, dedicated for use therewith, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Consolidated International Equipment & Supply Co., v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 442, C.D. 2671), wherein the court held that the paper cutters and the motors for said paper cutters were separate entities rather than an entirety, the protest was dismissed and the matter remanded for further proceedings to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the separate value of the paper cutters and motors in the manner provided by law (28 U.S.C. § 2636(d)).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Consolidated International Equipment & Supply Co. v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 1035, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1879 (cusc 1968).

60 Cust. Ct. 1035 (Consolidated International Equipment & Supply Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related