Consolidated Indemnity & Insurance v. Epstein

235 A.D. 661

This text of 235 A.D. 661 (Consolidated Indemnity & Insurance v. Epstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Consolidated Indemnity & Insurance v. Epstein, 235 A.D. 661 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendants contest the items of payments and their propriety and necessity and show by affidavits a right to an account of disposition of advances made to plaintiffs out of a fund created to complete building operations in which the parties were engaged. With these issues disputed a summary decision on motion ought not to have been made. The order granting summary relief should be reversed and the issues remitted to trial. The judgment and order should be reversed, with costs, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present ■ — Finch, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, Martin and Sherman, JJ. Judgment reversed, with costs, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 A.D. 661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/consolidated-indemnity-insurance-v-epstein-nyappdiv-1932.