Consolidated Freightways Corp. v. Terry Tuck, Inc.

612 F.2d 465
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 28, 1980
DocketC.A. No. 77-2119
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 612 F.2d 465 (Consolidated Freightways Corp. v. Terry Tuck, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Consolidated Freightways Corp. v. Terry Tuck, Inc., 612 F.2d 465 (9th Cir. 1980).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Under the Motor Carriers Act § 217(b), 49 U.S.C. § 317(b) (1976), Consolidated Freightways sued Terry Tuck for an amount still owing under the applicable ICC-approved tariff. Terry Tuck counterclaimed for fraud, alleging that the carrier knowingly misquoted the shipping rates. The district court granted Consolidated’s summary judgment motion for the amount still due, and it dismissed the counterclaim pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). The facts are admittedly indistinguishable from those occurring in Aero Trucking, Inc. v. Regal Tube Co., 594 F.2d 619 (7th Cir. 1979); Pettibone v. Richardson, 126 F.2d 969 (7th Cir. 1942), and F. Burkhart Mfg. Co. v. Fort Worth & D. C. Ry. Co., 149 F.2d 909 (8th Cir. 1945). We agree with the Seventh and Eighth Circuits that no claim for relief can be predicated on a carrier’s alleged fraudulent misquotation of tariffs. Accordingly, the district court’s judgment and order are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
612 F.2d 465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/consolidated-freightways-corp-v-terry-tuck-inc-ca9-1980.