Consolidated Fisheries Co. v. Marshall
39 A.2d 413, 42 Del. 532, 3 Terry 532, 1944 Del. LEXIS 33
Opinion
The judgment in the Court below, 32 A. 2d 426, is affirmed.
The question was thoroughly discussed in the opinion filed in that court, and no further discussion seems necessary.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Consolidated Fisheries Co. v. Marshall, 39 A.2d 413, 42 Del. 532, 3 Terry 532, 1944 Del. LEXIS 33 (Del. 1944).
39 A.2d 413 (Consolidated Fisheries Co. v. Marshall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Conway v. Wolf Liquor Co.
200 A.2d 831 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1964)
State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. v. Short
202 A.2d 278 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1964)
S & S Builders, Inc. v. Di Mondi
126 A.2d 826 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1956)
Wilmington Parking Authority v. Ranken
105 A.2d 614 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1954)