Consolidated Electric Lamp Co. v. Mitchell

D.C. Circuit

Consolidated Electric Lamp Co. v. Mitchell

259 F.2d 189, 104 U.S. App. D.C. 32, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 5178

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedSeptember 18, 1958

DocketNo. 14142

StatusPublished

This text of 259 F.2d 189 (Consolidated Electric Lamp Co. v. Mitchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Consolidated Electric Lamp Co. v. Mitchell, 259 F.2d 189, 104 U.S. App. D.C. 32, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 5178 (D.C. Cir. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case, which is similar in nature to Mitchell v. Covington Mills, 97 U.S.App. D.C. 165, 229 F.2d 506, certiorari denied 1955, 350 U.S. 1002, 76 S.Ct. 546, 100 L.Ed. 865, rehearing denied 1956, 351 U. S. 934, 76 S.Ct. 787, 100 L.Ed. 1462, involves an industry-wide wage determination under the Walsh-Healey Act, 41 U. S.C.A. § 35(b), for the electric lamp industry. We think the principal issue here — the validity of the determination — is governed by the decision in Covington Mills, and we therefore uphold the determination, on the facts revealed by the record before us. We have considered all the points urged by appellants, but find no reversible error. The action of the District Court in granting summary judgment for the ap-pellee Mitchell is therefore

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case, which is similar in nature to Mitchell v. Covington Mills, 97 U.S.App. D.C. 165, 229 F.2d 506, certiorari denied 1955, 350 U.S. 1002, 76 S.Ct. 546, 100 L.Ed. 865, rehearing denied 1956, 351 U. S. 934, 76 S.Ct. 787, 100 L.Ed. 1462, involves an industry-wide wage determination under the Walsh-Healey Act, 41 U. S.C.A. § 35(b), for the electric lamp industry. We think the principal issue here — the validity of the determination — is governed by the decision in Covington Mills, and we therefore uphold the determination, on the facts revealed by the record before us. We have considered all the points urged by appellants, but find no reversible error. The action of the District Court in granting summary judgment for the ap-pellee Mitchell is therefore

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 F.2d 189, 104 U.S. App. D.C. 32, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 5178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/consolidated-electric-lamp-co-v-mitchell-cadc-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack