Consolidated Edison Co. v. Watkins
927 F.2d 1227, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 4316, 1991 WL 36481
Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals·Decided March 15, 1991·No. No. DC-113·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Upon consideration of the briefs and the record, and the contentions of the parties [1228]*1228at oral argument, we have determined that Appellants have failed to demonstrate error. Accordingly, we affirm on the basis of the district court opinion. 752 F.Supp. 1082 (D.C.1990).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Consolidated Edison Co. v. Watkins, 927 F.2d 1227, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 4316, 1991 WL 36481 (tecoa 1991).
927 F.2d 1227 (Consolidated Edison Co. v. Watkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Empower Brands LLC v. Tristar Products, Inc.
D. Delaware, 2024
Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. Abraham
271 F. Supp. 2d 104 (District of Columbia, 2003)