Consolidated Edison Co. v. Maltbie

New York Court of Appeals

Consolidated Edison Co. v. Maltbie

90 N.E.2d 498, 300 N.Y. 645, 1950 N.Y. LEXIS 1440

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 13, 1950

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 90 N.E.2d 498 (Consolidated Edison Co. v. Maltbie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Consolidated Edison Co. v. Maltbie, 90 N.E.2d 498, 300 N.Y. 645, 1950 N.Y. LEXIS 1440 (N.Y. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for reargument denied. Motion to amend the remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when [646]*646returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Questions under the Federal Constitution were presented and passed upon by this court, viz., whether section 114 of the Public Service Law of the State of New York and the order of the Public Service Commission, dated December 30, 1948, in Case No. 12455, made pursuant thereto violated any of the rights of the respondent guaranteed by section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution. This court held that the aforesaid statute and order of the commission did not violate any of the rights of the respondent guaranteed by that provision of the Federal Constitution. [See 300 N. Y. 196.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for reargument denied. Motion to amend the remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when [646]*646returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Questions under the Federal Constitution were presented and passed upon by this court, viz., whether section 114 of the Public Service Law of the State of New York and the order of the Public Service Commission, dated December 30, 1948, in Case No. 12455, made pursuant thereto violated any of the rights of the respondent guaranteed by section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution. This court held that the aforesaid statute and order of the commission did not violate any of the rights of the respondent guaranteed by that provision of the Federal Constitution. [See 300 N. Y. 196.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 N.E.2d 498, 300 N.Y. 645, 1950 N.Y. LEXIS 1440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/consolidated-edison-co-v-maltbie-ny-1950.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack