Consolidated Edison Co. v. Maltbie

90 N.E.2d 498, 300 N.Y. 645, 1950 N.Y. LEXIS 1440
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 13, 1950·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Motion for reargument denied. Motion to amend the remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when [646] returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Questions under the Federal Constitution were presented and passed upon by this court, viz., whether section 114 of the Public Service Law of the State of New York and the order of the Public Service Commission, dated December 30, 1948, in Case No. 12455, made pursuant thereto violated any of the rights of the respondent guaranteed by section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution. This court held that the aforesaid statute and order of the commission did not violate any of the rights of the respondent guaranteed by that provision of the Federal Constitution. [See 300 N. Y. 196.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Consolidated Edison Co. v. Maltbie, 90 N.E.2d 498, 300 N.Y. 645, 1950 N.Y. LEXIS 1440 (N.Y. 1950).

90 N.E.2d 498 (Consolidated Edison Co. v. Maltbie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New Rochelle Water Co. v. Public Service Commission
292 N.E.2d 767 (New York Court of Appeals, 1972)
New Rochelle Water Co. v. Public Service Commission
38 A.D.2d 375 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1972)
Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Maltbie
90 N.E.2d 35 (New York Court of Appeals, 1949)