Consolidated Edison Co. v. Electric Insurance

269 A.D.2d 288, 704 N.Y.S.2d 459, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2012

This text of 269 A.D.2d 288 (Consolidated Edison Co. v. Electric Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Consolidated Edison Co. v. Electric Insurance, 269 A.D.2d 288, 704 N.Y.S.2d 459, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2012 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered on or about January 6, 1999, which, inter alia, denied petitioner’s application pursuant to CPLR 7503 to stay arbitration and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The parties clearly agreed to submit to “alternate dispute resolution” (i.e., arbitration or “such other procedure to which GE and Con Ed may agree in writing”) any dispute, including one involving waiver, arising out of any judgment or settlement in the underlying wrongful death action(s). Since this agreement is unquestionably valid and timely invoked, and, indeed, has been scrupulously complied with by respondent to petitioner’s advantage, the present dispute arising out of the judgment in the underlying action was properly found by the IAS Court one to be resolved exclusively through arbitration (see, Matter of Prime v Jonas, 38 NY2d 570, 574; Olympia & York OLP Co. v Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 214 AD2d 509, 511-512). Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Mazzarelli, Lerner and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re the Arbitration Between Prinze & Jonas
345 N.E.2d 295 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
Olympia & York OLP Co. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
214 A.D.2d 509 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 A.D.2d 288, 704 N.Y.S.2d 459, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2012, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/consolidated-edison-co-v-electric-insurance-nyappdiv-2000.