Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Garofano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Garofano

66 A.D.2d 832, 411 N.Y.S.2d 545, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14166

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 26, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 66 A.D.2d 832 (Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Garofano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Garofano, 66 A.D.2d 832, 411 N.Y.S.2d 545, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14166 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

In a condemnation proceeding, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, entered October 5, 1977, which, inter alia, (1) confirmed the amended report of the Commissioners of Appraisal, dated July 28, 1976, (2) directed appellant to pay respondent Peter Garofano the sum of $44,000 as compensation and (3) granted said respondent an additional allowance of $2,200. Order affirmed, with costs. In this matter, issues of fact were presented to the commissioners and resolved by them. It cannot be said that their findings were not supported by substantial evidence. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Titone, Hawkins and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a condemnation proceeding, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, entered October 5, 1977, which, inter alia, (1) confirmed the amended report of the Commissioners of Appraisal, dated July 28, 1976, (2) directed appellant to pay respondent Peter Garofano the sum of $44,000 as compensation and (3) granted said respondent an additional allowance of $2,200. Order affirmed, with costs. In this matter, issues of fact were presented to the commissioners and resolved by them. It cannot be said that their findings were not supported by substantial evidence. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Titone, Hawkins and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 A.D.2d 832, 411 N.Y.S.2d 545, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/consolidated-edison-co-of-new-york-inc-v-garofano-nyappdiv-1978.