Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. East Hudson Parkway Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. East Hudson Parkway Authority

59 A.D.2d 926, 399 N.Y.S.2d 426, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14145

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 21, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 59 A.D.2d 926 (Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. East Hudson Parkway Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. East Hudson Parkway Authority, 59 A.D.2d 926, 399 N.Y.S.2d 426, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14145 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel respondent to issue a license to petitioner for the installation and maintenance of certain utility facilities in, under or upon the Murray Avenue Bridge without a waiver by petitioner of its rights under section 459 of the Public Authorities Law, the appeal is from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated December 27, 1976, which, inter alia, determined that respondent may require a waiver by petitioner of any rights provided by statute with respect to relocation costs. Judgment affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Wood at Special Term. Margett, J. P., Rabin, Titone and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel respondent to issue a license to petitioner for the installation and maintenance of certain utility facilities in, under or upon the Murray Avenue Bridge without a waiver by petitioner of its rights under section 459 of the Public Authorities Law, the appeal is from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated December 27, 1976, which, inter alia, determined that respondent may require a waiver by petitioner of any rights provided by statute with respect to relocation costs. Judgment affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Wood at Special Term. Margett, J. P., Rabin, Titone and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 A.D.2d 926, 399 N.Y.S.2d 426, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/consolidated-edison-co-of-new-york-inc-v-east-hudson-parkway-authority-nyappdiv-1977.