Consolidated Credit Corp. v. Short

161 S.E.2d 448, 117 Ga. App. 574, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 1145
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 2, 1968·No. 43370·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Felton, Chief Judge.

The petition in this action prays for, in addition to punitive damages, an injunction against the defendants, a credit loan company and its agent, from “molesting, harassing and threatening ... by telephone, letters, or in person” the plaintiff, who signed as security a promissory note which subsequently became in default and who, at the time of her signing the note and thereafter, was a married woman. The petition is not for a declaratory judgment; therefore the prayer for the injunction would not be an interlocutory device until a decision on the merits of the petition. The case is, therefore, of the class of which the Supreme Court has exclusive jurisdiction and it is, accordingly transferred to that court.

Transferred to the Supreme Court.

Eberhardt and Whitman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Consolidated Credit Corp. v. Short, 161 S.E.2d 448, 117 Ga. App. 574, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 1145 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968).

161 S.E.2d 448 (Consolidated Credit Corp. v. Short) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Consolidated Credit Corp. v. Short
162 S.E.2d 435 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1968)