Consolidated Construction Corp. v. Board of Education

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Consolidated Construction Corp. v. Board of Education

155 Misc. 586, 280 N.Y.S. 87, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1196

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided May 10, 1935·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It was error to deny plaintiff’s application for leave to discontinue the action made before plaintiff completed its proofs. (2 Carmody New York Prac. 1464; Civ. Prac. Act, § 457; Dailey v. Northern N. Y. Utilities, 129 Misc. 183, at p. 186.)

Judgment and orders reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and motion for discontinuance granted upon payment of costs within ten days, the costs awarded by this court to be set off against the costs upon discontinuance.

All concur; present, Hammer, Callahan and Shientag. JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

It was error to deny plaintiff’s application for leave to discontinue the action made before plaintiff completed its proofs. (2 Carmody New York Prac. 1464; Civ. Prac. Act, § 457; Dailey v. Northern N. Y. Utilities, 129 Misc. 183, at p. 186.)

Judgment and orders reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and motion for discontinuance granted upon payment of costs within ten days, the costs awarded by this court to be set off against the costs upon discontinuance.

All concur; present, Hammer, Callahan and Shientag. JJ.

Consolidated Construction Corp. v. Board of Education, 155 Misc. 586, 280 N.Y.S. 87, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1196 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

155 Misc. 586 (Consolidated Construction Corp. v. Board of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related