Consolidated City of Jacksonville v. Teage
This text of 424 So. 2d 67 (Consolidated City of Jacksonville v. Teage) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Consolidated City of Jacksonville appeals a judgment entered upon a jury verdict. We affirm.
Teague was awarded $18,000 for injuries done during his arrest by the City’s police officers.
We do not find that one witness’s use of the term “aggravation” in describing an old fracture which became symptomatic upon the arrest requires a new trial. The case was not tried upon a theory of aggravation nor was the jury instructed on aggravation.
The description by Teage of his treatment by the officers supports the jury’s finding of excessive use of force.
The amount of the verdict is clearly within the jury’s discretion considering the past and continuing medical bills and lost wages.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
424 So. 2d 67, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/consolidated-city-of-jacksonville-v-teage-fladistctapp-1982.