Consolidated Agency Co. v. Townsley

New York Supreme Court

Consolidated Agency Co. v. Townsley

72 Misc. 155, 129 N.Y.S. 773

DecidedMay 15, 1911

StatusPublished

This text of 72 Misc. 155 (Consolidated Agency Co. v. Townsley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Consolidated Agency Co. v. Townsley, 72 Misc. 155, 129 N.Y.S. 773 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

Giegerich, J.

The former order in proceedings supplementary to execution hears the indorsement that “ the judgment creditor having been duly called on April 4, 1911, and not appearing its default is hereby noted and the within proceeding dismissed.” It was held by the Appellate Term in MeAlpin v. Stoddard, 54 Misc. Rep. 647, that such an indorsement constituted an order as defined by section 767 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and that if entry thereof is required it is the duty of the judgment debtor to enter the order. The point urged by the latter that no order was made upon such decision is, therefore, not well taken, and the motion to vacate the present order for the debtor’s examination is, therefore, denied, with ten dollars costs, and he is directed to submit to examination at a time and place to be designated in the order to he entered hereon. Settle order on notice.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Giegerich, J.

The former order in proceedings supplementary to execution hears the indorsement that “ the judgment creditor having been duly called on April 4, 1911, and not appearing its default is hereby noted and the within proceeding dismissed.” It was held by the Appellate Term in MeAlpin v. Stoddard, 54 Misc. Rep. 647, that such an indorsement constituted an order as defined by section 767 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and that if entry thereof is required it is the duty of the judgment debtor to enter the order. The point urged by the latter that no order was made upon such decision is, therefore, not well taken, and the motion to vacate the present order for the debtor’s examination is, therefore, denied, with ten dollars costs, and he is directed to submit to examination at a time and place to be designated in the order to he entered hereon. Settle order on notice.

Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 Misc. 155, 129 N.Y.S. 773, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/consolidated-agency-co-v-townsley-nysupct-1911.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack