Consignees' Favorite Box Co. v. Meers

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Consignees' Favorite Box Co. v. Meers

62 S.E. 1000, 5 Ga. App. 155, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 43

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 10, 1908

Docket1288

StatusPublished

This text of 62 S.E. 1000 (Consignees' Favorite Box Co. v. Meers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Consignees' Favorite Box Co. v. Meers, 62 S.E. 1000, 5 Ga. App. 155, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 43 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

Powell, J.

It appearing that the claimant bought the property in dispute in settlement of a bona fide indebtedness from the defendant in attachment, and had taken possession of it prior to the issuance and levy of the attachment, and there being nothing in the record to impeach the good faith of the transaction, the verdict finding the property subject to attachment was contrary to law. See Ga., Fla. & Ala. Ry. Co. v. Sizer, 4 Ga. App. 126 (60 S. E. 1026). Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell, J.

It appearing that the claimant bought the property in dispute in settlement of a bona fide indebtedness from the defendant in attachment, and had taken possession of it prior to the issuance and levy of the attachment, and there being nothing in the record to impeach the good faith of the transaction, the verdict finding the property subject to attachment was contrary to law. See Ga., Fla. & Ala. Ry. Co. v. Sizer, 4 Ga. App. 126 (60 S. E. 1026). Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 S.E. 1000, 5 Ga. App. 155, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/consignees-favorite-box-co-v-meers-gactapp-1908.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack