Consiglio v. Consiglio

143 A.D.2d 505, 533 N.Y.S.2d 260, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10717

This text of 143 A.D.2d 505 (Consiglio v. Consiglio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Consiglio v. Consiglio, 143 A.D.2d 505, 533 N.Y.S.2d 260, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10717 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, and defendants’ motion denied. Memorandum: Special Term erred in granting defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs complaint pursuant to Partnership Law § 74 on the ground that it was barred by the Statute of Limitations (CPLR [506]*5063211 [a] [5]). There is an issue of fact when, if ever, the partnership was dissolved, and thus, when, if ever, the cause of action accrued (see, Bernstein v La Rue, 120 AD2d 476, lv dismissed 70 NY2d 746). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J. — dismiss complaint.) Present —Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Green, Pine and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bernstein v. La Rue
120 A.D.2d 476 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
143 A.D.2d 505, 533 N.Y.S.2d 260, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/consiglio-v-consiglio-nyappdiv-1988.