Conshohocken Tube Co. v. Iron Car Equipment Co.

28 A. 1119, 161 Pa. 391, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 704

Opinion

Per Curiam,

There is no merit in either of the specifications. The proof of plaintiff’s claim was clear, distinct, positive.and uncontradicted, and hence there was no error in directing the jury to find in favor of plaintiff for the amount of its claim.

Judgment affirmed.

Cf. Roberts v. Car Equipment Co., above, page 348.