Consford v. State

75 So. 335, 200 Ala. 23, 1917 Ala. LEXIS 277
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedApril 26, 1917
Docket4 Div. 722.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 75 So. 335 (Consford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Consford v. State, 75 So. 335, 200 Ala. 23, 1917 Ala. LEXIS 277 (Ala. 1917).

Opinion

ANDERSON, C. J.

The only points upon which a review of the Court of Appeals is urged in brief of counsel relate to a finding of facts ¡by tbe said court, or in. tbe application of the law to the facts, and we have repeatedly held that we will not review or revise the conclusions and findings of the Court of Appeals in these respects. Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 South. 91, and cases there cited.

The writ is denied.

McClellan, sayre, and Gardner, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Flournoy v. State
120 So. 2d 124 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1960)
Morrison v. State
100 So. 2d 746 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1958)
Lawhorn v. State
89 So. 2d 693 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1956)
Royal Ins. Co. v. Story
40 So. 2d 724 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
75 So. 335, 200 Ala. 23, 1917 Ala. LEXIS 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/consford-v-state-ala-1917.