(CONSENT) Kolb v. County of Placer

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedOctober 15, 2019
Docket2:19-cv-00079
StatusUnknown

This text of (CONSENT) Kolb v. County of Placer ((CONSENT) Kolb v. County of Placer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
(CONSENT) Kolb v. County of Placer, (E.D. Cal. 2019).

Opinion

1 OFFICE OF THE PLACER COUNTY COUNSEL Gregory Warner (SBN 282490) 2 175 Fulweiler Avenue Auburn, California 95603 3 || gwamner @placer.ca. gov Telephone: (530) 889-4044 4 Facsimile: (530) 889-4069 5 |JPORTER SCOTT A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 6 || Carl L. Fessenden, SBN 161494 John R. Whitefleet, SBN 213301 7 || 350 University Ave., Suite 200 Sacramento, California 95825 8 || cfessenden@porterscott.com jwhitefleet @ porterscott.com 9 || TEL: 916.929.1481 FAX: 916.927.3706 10 Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF PLACER and DEPUTY CURTIS HONEYCUTT 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA i ‘oO |, || SAMUEL KOLB, J.K., by and through his No. 2:19-cv-00079 DB Guardian ad Litem, KARIN KOLB, and 2S 15 |] KARIN KOLB, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER aaa Plaintiffs, 7 V. 18 COUNTY OF PLACER; DEPUTY CURTIS 19 || HONEYCUTT, and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 20 Defendants. 21 / 22 23 Defendants COUNTY OF PLACER, Deputy HONEYCUTT, and Plaintiffs 24 || SAMUEL KOLB, J.K., by and through his Guardian ad Litem, KARIN KOLB, and 25 || KARIN KOLB (“the Parties”) hereby enter a stipulated protective order to facilitate 26 || disclosure of confidential discovery materials in this case. 27 The Parties in good faith believe that certain documents relevant to the above- 28 ||}captioned case qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c),

{02091178.DOCX} STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1 including information that is (a) confidential, sensitive, or potentially invasive of an 2 individual’s privacy interests; (b) not generally known; and, (c) not normally revealed 3 to the public or third parties or, if disclosed to third parties, would require such third 4 parties to maintain the information in confidence. 5 These confidential documents include, but are not limited to: 6 1. County Personnel Files of Deputy HONEYCUTT 7 2. Medical records of Samuel Kolb 8 In light of the sensitive nature of the documents potentially to be disclosed, the 9 parties hereby request that any such disclosure be governed by a stipulated protective 10 order. 11 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by, among and between the parties through 12 their respective undersigned counsel of record that: 13 1. Designating Protected Materials: Any party may designate 14 information, regardless of how it is stored or maintained, that qualify for protection 15 under FRCP 26(c) as “confidential” subject to this agreement. Each Party that 16 designates information or items for protection under this agreement must take care to 17 limit any such designation to specific material being produced in conjunction with 18 this action. 19 2. A producing/designating Party may designate protected materials as 20 confidential by affixing a mark labeling them “Confidential,” provided that such 21 marking does not obscure or obliterate the content of any record. If any confidential 22 materials cannot be labeled with this marking, those materials shall be otherwise 23 marked “Confidential.” 24 3. If any document or information designated as confidential pursuant to 25 this Stipulated Protective Order is used or disclosed during the course of a deposition, 26 that portion of the deposition record reflecting such material shall be stamped with 27 the appropriate designation and access shall be limited pursuant to the terms of this 28 Stipulated Protective Order. The court reporter for the deposition shall mark the 1 deposition transcript cover page and all appropriate pages or exhibits and each copy 2 thereof. Only individuals who are authorized by this Protective Order to see or receive 3 such material may be present during the discussion or disclosure of such material. 4 4. Challenging Confidentiality Designations: A party may challenge a 5 designation of confidentiality at any time that is consistent with the Court’s 6 scheduling order. The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be 7 on the designating/producing party. Before seeking court intervention, the 8 challenging party shall meet and confer with the producing party. Until the matter is 9 resolved by the parties or the Court, the information in question shall continue to be 10 treated according to its designation under the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order. 11 5. Use of Protected Material: Protected Material shall be produced only 12 to the Parties and to counsel of record for the Parties for the purpose of prosecuting, 13 defending or attempting to settle this action. Receiving parties shall take reasonable 14 steps to prevent disclosure of protected material to any third party. 15 6. Documents or materials designated under this Protective Order as 16 “Confidential” may only be disclosed to the following persons: 17 (a) Parties; 18 (b) Counsel, including their respective associates, clerks, legal 19 assistants, support personnel, investigators, adjusters, and 20 insurance carriers, and other companies retained to provide 21 litigation support services (e.g. photocopy services); 22 (c) Court personnel, including stenographic reporters or 23 videographers engaged in proceedings as are necessarily 24 incidental to the preparation for the trial of the civil action; 25 (d) Any designated or retainer expert, consultant or investigator 26 retained in connection with this action; 27 (e) Any mediator, settlement officer, or the finder of fact at the time 28 of trial; and 1 (f) Witnesses during their depositions in this action. 2 7. Prior to the disclosure of any “Confidential” information to any person 3 identified in paragraph 5, each such recipient of “Confidential” information shall be 4 provided with a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order, which he or she shall read. 5 Upon reading this Stipulated Protective Order, such person shall acknowledge that he 6 or she has read this Stipulated Protective Order and agrees to abide by its terms. Such 7 person also must consent to be subject to the jurisdiction of the United States District 8 Court for the Eastern District of California, including without limitation any 9 proceeding for contempt. Provisions of this Stipulated Protective Order, insofar as 10 they restrict disclosure and use of the material, shall be in effect until further order of 11 this Court. The attorneys designated in subparts (a) and (b) of Paragraph 3 above 12 shall be responsible for internally tracking the identities of those individuals to whom 13 copies of documents marked “Confidential” are given. Producing parties may request 14 the identities of said individual(s) upon the final termination of the litigation or if it is 15 able to demonstrate a good faith basis that receiving parties, or agents thereof, have 16 breached the terms of the Stipulated Protective Order. 17 8. Subject to the terms of this Agreement, nothing herein shall restrict a 18 recipient of Protected Material from: (a) making working copies, abstracts, digests 19 and analysis of such information for use in connection with settlement negotiations; 20 or (b) converting or translating Protected Material into a different format for storage 21 or analysis, provided that access to Protected Material, in whatever form stored or 22 reproduced, shall be limited to qualified recipients. 23 9. Filing Protected Material: Any party seeking to file any documents or 24 materials designated as “Confidential” pursuant to this Stipulated Protective Order, 25 must comply with Local Rule 141 of the Local Rules of Practice for the United States 26 District Court, Eastern District of California (Local Rules). 27 10.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
Roneys v. Roneys
7 Va. 13 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1836)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
(CONSENT) Kolb v. County of Placer, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/consent-kolb-v-county-of-placer-caed-2019.